Quantcast
Channel: All Ethernet Switching posts
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 10307

MC LAG ex4600 - Setup problems

$
0
0

Hi

 

Im having issues setting up MC LAG on a pair of ex4600 with the recommended release code D40.

 

I have the following topology:

MC LAG.jpg

 

link xe-0/0/23 is used exclusively for the ICCP traffic

and ae0 is the ICL for the data plane.

 

from ex4600 PE1 on left side

[ multi-chassis ]
multi-chassis-protection 10.1.1.2 {
    interface ae0;
}

[interfaces irb ]
arp-l2-validate;
unit 3999 {
    family inet {
        address 10.1.1.1/30;
    }
}

[interfaces ae0]
description "EtherChannel between ex4600 ICL";
mtu 9216;
aggregated-ether-options {
    link-speed 10g;
}
unit 0 {
    family ethernet-switching {
        interface-mode trunk;
        vlan {
            members [ 10-16 18 20 30 40 50-51 55 60-65 70 80-83 90-91 100 111 114 117 120 123 150-151 279 350 1000 ];
        }
    }
}

[ interfaces xe-0/0/23 ]
description "ICCP Link to ex4600 xe-0/0/23";
mtu 9216;
unit 0 {
    family ethernet-switching {
        interface-mode trunk;
        vlan {
            members ICCP-Vlan;
        }
    }
}


I originally had the multi-chassis protection link as xe-0/0/23.

 

When I connect the client with both links, everything looks ok but I am getting traffic looping.

and errors like:

Jan 17 00:21:19  rtaggtmp01 l2ald[1735]: L2ALD_FREE_MAC_FAILED: ERROR:FwdE:0x9bffd00 EFlag:0x1802101f RGID:0001  AEID:0006  SERVICE-ID:01 UNIT:00 PEERID:16843018MAC: 08:5b:0e:72:4d:ae moved: already in RMAC List
Jan 17 00:21:21  rtaggtmp01 l2ald[1735]: L2ALD_FREE_MAC_FAILED: ERROR:FwdE:0x9c22000 EFlag:0x1802101f RGID:0001  AEID:0006  SERVICE-ID:01 UNIT:00 PEERID:16843018MAC: 08:5b:0e:78:23:bc moved: already in RMAC List
Jan 17 00:21:40  rtaggtmp01 l2ald[1735]: L2ALD_FREE_MAC_FAILED: ERROR:FwdE:0x9c1c100 EFlag:0x1802101f RGID:0001  AEID:0006  SERVICE-ID:01 UNIT:00 PEERID:16843018MAC: 08:5b:0e:72:4d:ae moved: already in RMAC List

Reading docs last night it states that the protection link should be the ICL, Which I understand to be the ae0 interface.

thus indicated in the code above.

 

I shutdown the interface on second ex4600 towards the client

then enabled mc-ae on the ae6 on primary ex4600.

 

the first ex4600 complains that protection link is not configured.

 

so questions are:

 

1.  Which link should be the multi-chassis protection link, the ICCP link xe-0/0/23 or the ICL ae0?

2.  As this client is not ONLY attached to the ex4600 pair and there is RSTP running in the network, what if anything needs to be done?  I saw some comments about having to set the bridge ID to be the same?

3.  Is anything else wrong with the config?

 

thanks

 

 


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 10307

Trending Articles