Quantcast
Channel: All Ethernet Switching posts
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 10307

Re: Virtual Chass - vme0 vs em0

$
0
0

Hi Carlos,

Thank you for your reply.

 

1) I am using 2 x qfx5100-48s-6q to setup the virtual chasiss,  there is no me interface.  Only em0.  Originally when i setup the switch individually,  each em0.0 is assigned its own IP.
switch1 em0.0 - 192.168.0.1/24
switch2 em0.0 - 192.168.0.2/24

switch1 vme.0 - 192.168.0.3/24

 

After the virtual chassis  is up,   I can access the em0.0 - 192.168.0.1,  but i cannot access 192.168.0.2.

I also cannot access 192.168.0.3 (because the vme interface is down).

 

2) Using the groups method dont seems to work for me.

set groups member0 interfaces em0 unit 0 family inet address 192.168.0.1/24
set groups member3 interfaces em0 unit 0 family inet address 192.168.0.2/24

After commiting, i still can't access 192.168.0.2.

 

=============================================

 

q1) So it seems to me

access via em0.0 ->  192.168.0.1 > always go to the master

access via vme.0 -> 192.168.0.3 -> always go to the master  (provided that i remove the em0 interface)

What the difference ?

 

q2) Any idea why the group method can't work  so i can access the switches individually ?

 

 

q3) Can i confirm that

- the EM and VME interface cannot work concurrently

- VME interafce cannot work with mgmt_junos management routing instance ?

 

Regards,

Alan

 

 

 

 


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 10307

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>