Quantcast
Channel: All Ethernet Switching posts
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 10307

QFX5100 Error Messages from jdhcpd

$
0
0

Hi everybody,


These 2 "Message-Types" keep spamming the Logs so hard it's impossible to read the other Log-Messages.

QFX5100-24Q-2P, running recommended 14.1X53-D35.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aug 22 13:23:37 switch-00001 jdhcpd: libstats_op_iflstats_using_sec_index: failed the operation (2) from DB, db_ret: -30989, ret:-7
Aug 22 13:25:25 switch-00001 jdhcpd: libstats_op_iflstats_using_sec_index: failed the operation (2) from DB, db_ret: -30989, ret:-7
Aug 22 13:26:12 switch-00001 jdhcpd: libstats_op_iflstats_using_sec_index: failed the operation (2) from DB, db_ret: -30989, ret:-7
Aug 22 13:26:21 switch-00001 jdhcpd: libstats_op_iflstats_using_sec_index: failed the operation (2) from DB, db_ret: -30989, ret:-7
Aug 22 13:27:27 switch-00001 jdhcpd: libstats_op_iflstats_using_sec_index: failed the operation (2) from DB, db_ret: -30989, ret:-7
Aug 22 13:27:47 switch-00001 jdhcpd: libstats_op_iflstats_using_sec_index: failed the operation (2) from DB, db_ret: -30989, ret:-7
Aug 22 13:28:59 switch-00001 jdhcpd: libstats_op_iflstats_using_sec_index: failed the operation (2) from DB, db_ret: -30989, ret:-7
Aug 22 13:29:00 switch-00001 jdhcpd: libstats_op_iflstats_using_sec_index: failed the operation (2) from DB, db_ret: -30989, ret:-7
Aug 22 13:29:04 switch-00001 jdhcpd: libstats_op_iflstats_using_sec_index: failed the operation (2) from DB, db_ret: -30989, ret:-7
Aug 22 13:29:08 switch-00001 jdhcpd: libstats_op_iflstats_using_sec_index: failed the operation (2) from DB, db_ret: -30989, ret:-7
Aug 22 13:29:16 switch-00001 jdhcpd: libstats_op_iflstats_using_sec_index: failed the operation (2) from DB, db_ret: -30989, ret:-7
Aug 22 13:29:33 switch-00001 jdhcpd: libstats_op_iflstats_using_sec_index: failed the operation (2) from DB, db_ret: -30989, ret:-7
Aug 22 13:29:38 switch-00001 jdhcpd: libstats_op_iflstats_using_sec_index: failed the operation (2) from DB, db_ret: -30989, ret:-7
Aug 22 13:29:47 switch-00001 jdhcpd: libstats_op_iflstats_using_sec_index: failed the operation (2) from DB, db_ret: -30989, ret:-7
Aug 22 13:31:46 switch-00001 jdhcpd: libstats_op_iflstats_using_sec_index: failed the operation (2) from DB, db_ret: -30989, ret:-7
Aug 22 13:32:20 switch-00001 jdhcpd: libstats_op_iflstats_using_sec_index: failed the operation (2) from DB, db_ret: -30989, ret:-7

 

 

 

 

 

Aug 22 13:06:12 switch-00001 jdhcpd: DH_SVC_SENDMSG_FAILURE: sendmsg() from 0.0.0.0 to port 67 at 255.255.255.255 via interface 6 and routing instance default failed: Network is down
Aug 22 13:06:27 switch-00001 jdhcpd: DH_SVC_SENDMSG_FAILURE: sendmsg() from 0.0.0.0 to port 67 at 255.255.255.255 via interface 550 and routing instance default failed: Network is down
Aug 22 13:06:28 switch-00001 jdhcpd: DH_SVC_SENDMSG_FAILURE: sendmsg() from 0.0.0.0 to port 67 at 255.255.255.255 via interface 6 and routing instance default failed: Network is down
Aug 22 13:06:31 switch-00001 jdhcpd: DH_SVC_SENDMSG_FAILURE: sendmsg() from 0.0.0.0 to port 67 at 255.255.255.255 via interface 550 and routing instance default failed: Network is down
Aug 22 13:06:39 switch-00001 jdhcpd: DH_SVC_SENDMSG_FAILURE: sendmsg() from 0.0.0.0 to port 67 at 255.255.255.255 via interface 550 and routing instance default failed: Network is down

 

 

 

No Routing-Instances are used - before contacting JTAC has anyone ever seen this before?

 


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 10307

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>