Hi,
Please review the following threads:
https://forums.juniper.net/t5/Routing/IP-SLA-equilvilent-for-Junos/td-p/297703
https://forums.juniper.net/t5/IOS-to-Junos-I2J-Tips/ip-sla-ip-monitoring/td-p/140513
https://forums.juniper.net/t5/Ethernet-Switching/services-ip-monitoring-Feature-On-EX/td-p/274823
Note: "services-ip-monitoring" for specfic to SRX, but there are way around for that in thread.
Thanks Karan, I'll check those links.
Is there any other option to successfully get what I need without using any special methods and just configuring 2 simple static routes?
Unfortunely no (AFAIK for sure), those rpm probes are must to automate the failure detection.
Anyone know the TSB number for 12.3R12-S8?
Hi Alex,
Thank you and appreciate your efforts..
The scenario is P2P solution in between Cisco 6506 switch(H.O.) and Juniper EX 3400/4300(Branch location) for max 60 users.
Two Layer3 Link(different ISP) will be used for P2P connectivity. Both link need to up and active simultaneously. There are few configuration suggestion we have consider to achieve P2P connectivity for this scenario. First we will try LACP if that will not work then we will go for Layer3 VLAN / OSPF(with IPsec) / BGP / MPLS. There is some dependency at ISP end as well.
As I checked, Juniper EX3400/4300 has limited/no features for MPLS and IPsec. Need your expert advice to achieve the requirement.
Supported protocol - https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/reference/general/ex-series-l3-protocols-supported.html
Not supported protocol - https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/reference/general/ex-series-l3-protocols-not-supported.html
We also have same type of connectivity with other branch location. We used there LACP but observed asynchronous routing(3 ISP at H.O.) issue so we are using only one ISP link for the connectivity and second link remains ideal.
Thank you...
Hi,
Following is my understanding about your scenario.
Since provider link is an l3 link.your topology will be as follows.
Cisco 6509 (stand alone or VSS) --->192.168.1.0/30(provider/Cisco segment)-------provider cloud------->192.168.1.4/30-----Juniper EX 4200 (This is for one link)
Similar, setup will be there for secondary link as well.
If above scenario is correct, then ospf with authentication you may use for dynamic routing and failover to acheive your requirements.
If your links are l2, then following will be the scenario.
Cisco 6509 (stand alone or VSS) 192.168.1.1/30(provider/Cisco segment)-------provider cloud------->192.168.1.2/30 Juniper EX 4200 (This is for one link)
similar setup will be there for secondary link.
In this scenario, you may do lacp based aggregation where you may configure port channel on Cisco 6500 and ae config on Juniper ex 4200.
Hi Milind,
We have standalone cisco 6506 switch and 2 Layer 3 p2p link. Both link need to up and pass network traffic. We have concern about MPLS and IPsec functionality on EX platform.
Thank you
As you yourself already stated, EX4300 does not support IPSEC or MPLS (L3 VPN I assume is what you would be looking for?).
2milindmistry already told you solution was to run some Routing protocol, like OSPF, on both L3 links and then you could either let protocol choose best path, or potential enable ECMP to let both pathes, if equal, to be active. You might also want to consider running BFD over OSPF for faster end-to-end failure detection.
@milindmistry has provided you the answer, not sure what the confusion is? Have you asked this question to your local Juniper Partner or Sales team, from whom you purchased the Juniper gear? Both should be able to assist you.
C-3PO,
The list if bug fix for Junos 12.3R12-S8 in TSB is yet to be pubished. (it will be out soon).
There are total of 13 PR/Bug fixes in Junos 12.3R12-S8 & the JSA you listed is one of the bug fix in JUNOS 12.3R12-S8 (tracked via PR1269932).
We have ex2200-48p-4g 4-member VC.
show virtual-chassis
Preprovisioned Virtual Chassis
Virtual Chassis ID: 53c4.a597.02bb
Virtual Chassis Mode: Enabled
Mstr Mixed Route Neighbor List
Member ID Status Serial No Model prio Role Mode Mode ID Interface
0 (FPC 0) Prsnt CT********79 ex2200-48p-4g 129 Master* NA VC 1 vcp-255/1/2
2 vcp-255/1/3
1 (FPC 1) Prsnt CT********70 ex2200-48p-4g 129 Backup NA VC 0 vcp-255/1/2
3 vcp-255/1/3
2 (FPC 2) Prsnt CT********46 ex2200-48p-4g 0 Linecard NA VC 3 vcp-255/1/2
0 vcp-255/1/3
3 (FPC 3) Prsnt CT********45 ex2200-48p-4g 0 Linecard NA VC 1 vcp-255/1/2
2 vcp-255/1/3
After Junos downgrading from 15.1R5-S3.4 to 12.3R12-S7 LACP on sfp uplinks stopped working.
show lacp interfaces ae32 error: device ae32 not found
Booting VC back to 15.1R5-S3.4 from alternate slice brings LAG on sfp ports back...
show lacp interfaces ae32
Aggregated interface: ae32
LACP state: Role Exp Def Dist Col Syn Aggr Timeout Activity
ge-0/1/0 Actor No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Fast Active
ge-0/1/0 Partner No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Fast Active
ge-1/1/0 Actor No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Fast Active
ge-1/1/0 Partner No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Fast Active
LACP protocol: Receive State Transmit State Mux State
ge-0/1/0 Current Fast periodic Collecting distributing
ge-1/1/0 Current Fast periodic Collecting distributingLACP on regular copper ports (PIC 0 48x 10/100/1000 Base-T) works fine in both Junos versions.
Hi guys,
So I faced a really weird problem. I have a QFX5110 switches bundled into Virtual Chassis. And I have a standalone Cisco Catalyst 3560 switch.
I'm trying to setup a simple trunk between them and I just can't The biggest problem is that the interfaces doesn't even come up on both ends!
I tried to do command
show interfaces diagnostics optics ge-0/0/26
But it doesn't even get me any output !
What is going on ?
Any ideas what might be wrong, why even Layer 1 doesn't work ?
What is funny when I will take the cable off the Juniper and put into Cisco switch, everything between Cisco's just work.
Here is the details on Cisco switch.
Cisco IOS Software, C3560 Software (C3560-IPBASEK9-M), Version 12.2(44)SE5, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) Copyright (c) 1986-2009 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
BTW in log messages I can see
Feb 5 11:21:03 cvc kernel: if_msg_ifd_add: l2_count in add (0), for ifd:ge-0/0/26 Feb 5 11:21:03 cvc kernel: if_msg_ifd_add: l2_count in add (0), for ifd:ge-0/0/26 Feb 5 11:21:03 cvc kernel: if_pfe: Error 5 (Invalid) on IF command 3 (IFD add) Feb 5 11:21:03 cvc kernel: if_pfe: Error 8 (No IFD) on IF command 226 (IFD HW aconfig) Feb 5 11:21:03 cvc kernel: if_pfe: Error 8 (No IFD) on IF command 15 (IFD aconfig) Feb 5 11:21:03 cvc kernel: if_pfe: Error 8 (No IFD) on IF command 13 (IFD mconfig) Feb 5 11:21:03 cvc kernel: if_pfe: Error 8 (No IFD) on IF command 55 (Ether set boolean) Feb 5 11:21:03 cvc last message repeated 2 times Feb 5 11:21:03 cvc kernel: if_pfe: Error 8 (No IFD) on IF command 54 (Ether set uint8) Feb 5 11:21:03 cvc kernel: if_pfe: Error 8 (No IFD) on IF command 55 (Ether set boolean) Feb 5 11:21:03 cvc last message repeated 7 times Feb 5 11:21:03 cvc kernel: if_pfe: Error 8 (No IFD) on IF command 54 (Ether set uint8) Feb 5 11:21:03 cvc kernel: if_pfe: Error 8 (No IFD) on IF command 55 (Ether set boolean) Feb 5 11:21:03 cvc last message repeated 2 times Feb 5 11:21:03 cvc kernel: if_pfe: Error 8 (No IFD) on IF command 54 (Ether set uint8) Feb 5 11:21:03 cvc last message repeated 2 times Feb 5 11:21:03 cvc kernel: if_pfe: Error 8 (No IFD) on IF command 151 (Ether set uint32) Feb 5 11:21:03 cvc kernel: if_pfe: Error 8 (No IFD) on IF command 54 (Ether set uint8) Feb 5 11:21:03 cvc last message repeated 4 times Feb 5 11:21:03 cvc kernel: if_pfe: Error 8 (No IFD) on IF command 151 (Ether set uint32) Feb 5 11:21:03 cvc kernel: if_pfe: Error 8 (No IFD) on IF command 54 (Ether set uint8) Feb 5 11:21:03 cvc kernel: if_pfe: Error 8 (No IFD) on IF command 263 (Unknown) Feb 5 11:21:03 cvc kernel: if_pfe: Error 8 (No IFD) on IF command 163 (Unknown) Feb 5 11:21:03 cvc kernel: if_pfe: Error 8 (No IFD) on IF command 117 (IFD queue stats) Feb 5 11:21:03 cvc kernel: if_pfe: Error 8 (No IFD) on IF command 56 (Ether get info) Feb 5 11:21:03 cvc kernel: if_pfe: Error 8 (No IFD) on IF command 5 (IFD stats) Feb 5 11:21:03 cvc fpc0 : dcbcm_init_port_common: Speed set failed for port 27 ret=-4 Feb 5 11:21:03 cvc fpc0 : port command handler failed processing cmd 1 for port 27 Feb 5 11:21:03 cvc fpc0 eth_ifd_bind: failed for (ge-0/0/26).... Feb 5 11:21:03 cvc fpc0 DCBCM(0/0): eth_ifd_bind failed for ge-0/0/26 Feb 5 11:21:03 cvc fpc0 DCBCM(0/0): eth attach for ge-0/0/26 failed Feb 5 11:21:03 cvc fpc0 IFFPC: ifd attach returned error 22 Feb 5 11:21:03 cvc fpc0 IFFPC: 'IFD add' (opcode 3) failed Feb 5 11:21:03 cvc fpc0 ifd 764; fpc ifd attach error (22) Feb 5 11:21:03 cvc fpc0 IFRT: 'IFD hardware address configuration' (opcode 226) failed Feb 5 11:21:03 cvc fpc0 ifd 764; does not exist Feb 5 11:21:03 cvc fpc0 IFRT: 'IFD address configuration' (opcode 15) failed Feb 5 11:21:03 cvc fpc0 ifd 764; does not exist Feb 5 11:21:03 cvc fpc0 IFRT: 'IFD media configuration' (opcode 13) failed Feb 5 11:21:03 cvc fpc0 ifd 764; does not exist
it's working now.
My mistake was using the same vlan for the source and my private network.
So now, I use 2 vlan, one for the source (only one port) and one for my private network (about 10 ports). Both have different subnet.
Then, I did created 2 irb for each VLAN, setting up my pim, igmp and igmp-snooping and everything works perfectly.
Since this is empty
I tried to do command
show interfaces diagnostics optics ge-0/0/26
But it doesn't even get me any output !
I suspect an issue with the optic. Can you see if the optic shows up as inserted here:
show chassis pic fpc-slot 0 pic-slot 0
this should list all the inserted optics. If it does not show up try remove and reinsert.
Then try a different port, if it works there the port hardware is bad if it does not work anywhere the optic is either bad or not compatible.
I have an EX4500 with an interface with nothing plugged into it. I go into J-web, delete out this section, and click commit
xe-0/0/1 {
description "vSphere15 Management";
mtu 9216;
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode access;
vlan {
members Hosts;
}
}
}
}
I then get this error message
There were error(s) delivering the configuration.
Error(s):
'interface'
1) XSTP : Interface xe-0/0/1.0 is not enabled for Ethernet Switching
2) XSTP : Interface xe-0/0/1.0 is not enabled for Ethernet Switching
3) configuration check-out failed
Why can't I delete this interface?