Quantcast
Channel: All Ethernet Switching posts
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 10307

Re: EX2300 & Ex3300 VC Licenses over deployment scenario

$
0
0

Actually these are questions either your Partner Account team or Juniper Account team should be able to answer easily.  As for EX2300-VC (with extra license) vs EX3300-VC, if this is not yet purchased, I would suggest maybe you look at either EX4300-VC or EX3400-VC.  The reason that EX2300 has a VC license is that the vaste majority of deployments have been (and will be) single standalone use cases.  Therefore the extra cost for [often non-used] VC functionality has been removed from base price and added in as a license cost.

 

Basicaly the higher the number, the more powerful the platform (better, faster, more costly RE functionality) along with deeper feature set, things like BGP, routing-instances, more OSPF neighbors, etc.  Also, generally higher numbers of same family equal new functionality.  For small examples (not exclusive list):

 

EX2200 -> EX2300 = 1G vs 10G uplinks

EX3300 -> EX3400 = no redundant power vs redundant power

EX4200 -> EX4300 = 128G fixed VC connectors, vs more flexiable 40G ports

 

I think you would be best off discuss your entire network needs with your local Partner and/or Juniper Sales Account team who can provide you all the options and then let you make a best decision.

 

My 2 cents worth.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 10307

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>