Quantcast
Channel: All Ethernet Switching posts
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 10307

Connecting Cisco4900M with VC 4300 EX no luck

$
0
0

Experts,

 

I am trying to connect using active / passive link aggregation Juniper VC 4300 with Cisco 4900M using SFP module on Cisco - Cisco CVR-X2-SFP10G= X2 TO SFP+ADAPTOR MODULE with Juniper SFP+ copper direct cables and no luck. Both theoritically should be compatybile. The logs from Cisco shows:

 

000015: *Feb  2 08:32:43.711: Port Te1/5: OneX Converter inserted: vendor: CISCO-FOXCONN, p/n: U58H136.01, s/n: FOC17055YJ0
000016: *Feb  2 08:32:43.711: Port Te1/6: OneX Converter inserted: vendor: CISCO-FOXCONN, p/n: U58H136.01, s/n: FOC17055YB3
000017: *Feb  2 08:32:43.711: Port Te1/7: OneX Converter inserted: vendor: CISCO-FOXCONN, p/n: U58H136.01, s/n: FOC17043LQM
000018: *Feb  2 08:32:43.711: Port Te1/8: OneX Converter inserted: vendor: CISCO-FOXCONN, p/n: U58H136.01, s/n: FOC17055Y72
000019: *Feb  2 08:32:44.011: %C4K_GLMMAN-3-NONSFPPLUSINONEXCONVERTERHOLE: Non-SFP+ inserted in port Te1/5 ( 4 ), which is for 10G SFP+ OneX Converter
000020: *Feb  2 08:32:44.011: %C4K_GLMMAN-3-NONSFPPLUSINONEXCONVERTERHOLE: Non-SFP+ inserted in port Te1/6 ( 5 ), which is for 10G SFP+ OneX Converter
 
The lines  Non-SFP+ inserted in port Te1/5 ( 4 ), which is for 10G SFP+ OneX Converter tels that Juniper SFP+ direct attach cable is Non-SFP+ ???????  Is this would be compatybility issue or proper configuration?
 
Thank You

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 10307

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>