Quantcast
Channel: All Ethernet Switching posts
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 10307

Evaluation Upgrade EX2300-C to EX2300 or EX3400 or EX4300

$
0
0

Hello,

 

I'm in charge of a branch where currently only an EX2300-C POE switch is deployed.
Besides that there's only a gateway and no aggregation devices.

 

From what I understand, EX2300-C only supports 10GbE for virtual chassis;
but only 1GbE when using the SFP+ ports for end-device connections.

 

I'd like to ask for help evaluating options for adding 10GbE connections to servers and storage.

 

As far as I can find my options are to

 

(1) Add an EX2300 switch - either with or without virtual chassis.

 

Pros
. Supports 10GbE for end-device connections (see datasheet)
. Same level of functionality as existing EX2300-C

. Virtual chassis works with existing EX2300-C
. Lower power consumption than other options

 

Cons
. Additional licenses required for virtual chassis
. Some 10GbE ports sacrificed when using virtual chassis

 

(2) Replace by one or more EX3400 switches.

 

Pros
. No additional licenses required for virtual chassis
. Virtual chassis over 40GbE doesn't require sacrificing 10GbE ports (which means more 10GbE ports)
. Same Junos OS version as EX2300
. Less expensive than EX2300 with virtual chassis licenses

 

Cons
. Existing EX2300-C has to be managed seperately or decommissioned from this branch
. Higher power consumption

 

(3) Replace by one or more EX4300 switches.

 

I've also looked into the EX4300 switches but I'm not sure these are for me.
When compared to EX3400 I don't see any added benefit for my setup.

 

----- ----- ----- ----- -----

 

Is my evaluation correct so far?

Can someone add more info about 10GbE end-device connections in that setup?

Are there additional options?

 

Thank you.

 

Dominic


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 10307

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>