Re: ICCP goes down when enabling aeX mc-ae lag option
Did you find a solution, I have been banging my head against the wall on this.
View ArticleRe: VRRP Master
Gotta thank you for pointing out the timers had to match. Solved it for me!
View ArticleVirtual chassis for Ex9208
Greeting folks as im moved from Cisco to Juniper I've been doing some resersh for the equivalent from VSS in juniper, but the issue all what i found is th VC in juniper is directly connected as in...
View ArticleRe: Virtual chassis for Ex9208
The equivalent of Cisco VSS in Juniper is called MC-LAG. Basically, 2 different switches appearing as one to external devices with a dual, separate control plane. Generally, each switch must be...
View ArticleLACP Trunk between QFX5100 VC and MX480 MC-LAG Routers
Greetings Everyone! I am attempting to connect two 10G links from our QFX5100 switches (VC Configuration) into our MX480 edge routers and having 20G LACP bonded connections. I am able to get the LACP...
View ArticleRe: Virtual chassis for Ex9208
thanks for your prompet, but what about VCE "Virtual chassis Extension" is it also not supported on the Ex9200?
View Articlerouting-instances without having a vlan assigned to an active physical...
I have created a routing instance, vlan and the irb interface. I have everything configured properly: the interface is added to the routing-instance and the irb interface is added to the vlan. What I...
View ArticleRe: routing-instances without having a vlan assigned to an active physical...
A vlan interface will go into a down state and its routes removed from the routing table if no interfaces in that vlan are active. I don't know of any way to force the vlan interface up, short of...
View ArticleRe: Virtual chassis for Ex9208
The EX9200 does support VC but only with the older RE module (EX9200-RE, not EX9200-RE2) https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/virtual-chassis-ex9200-understanding.html While...
View ArticleRe: Virtual chassis for Ex9208
@AAsh if by VCE, you mean Nexus 2K extension of Nexus 5K (and maybe 6K as well? I am no Cisco expert), then Juniper similar solution is Junos Fusion [for Enterprise]. Please note there are 3 different...
View ArticleRe: Virtual chassis for Ex9208
@smiker - actually that is an old link which should be depreciated. I have sent feedback to doc group about this. When EX9200 first came out, VC was supported, but an [internal] decision was made...
View ArticleRe: routing-instances without having a vlan assigned to an active physical...
Hello, wrote: What I am trying to accomplish is to have this routing-instance only route internally between other routing instances on the same switch. There is no need for routing to happen...
View ArticleRe: LACP Trunk between QFX5100 VC and MX480 MC-LAG Routers
Have you configured the Service -ID on both the MXs ?Also confirm are we seeing the ARP entries on the MX side -Kiran
View ArticleRe: LACP Trunk between QFX5100 VC and MX480 MC-LAG Routers
I'm not that used to bridge-domains on MX, but I think you are missing adding the interface to the bridge-domain on both MX's: set bridge-domains vlan-1151 interface ae1.0set bridge-domains vlan-1151...
View ArticleRe: Virtual chassis for Ex9208
thanks for your assist dose juniper have a tool or virtual enviroument thank i can use or even rent that support ex9200 and MC-LAG to practice in?
View ArticleEX9200 virtual environment
hello Junos dose juniper have a tool or virtual environment i can use or even rent that support ex9200 and MC-LAG to practice in?
View ArticleRe: EX9200 virtual environment
The virtual QFX platform would be your best bet for this. You can download the vQFX from the support site. https://www.juniper.net/support/downloads/?p=vqfxeval If your account is not authorizied for...
View ArticleRe: EX9200 virtual environment
thanks Steve for your feedback, i did what you suggest but somehow the xe intterface wont appearroot@vqfx-re> show chassis fpc pic-status {master:0}root@vqfx-re> show chassis fpc...
View ArticleRe: EX9200 virtual environment
@aash - I might suggest that VMX would be a better option for this, as MX and EX9200 are very similar products. Juniper does not have VEX SW, but VMX might be easier to use as this is a released...
View ArticleRe: IPv6 static routes and virtual routers?
show routing-instances R1instance-type virtual-router;routing-options { rib R1.inet6.0 { static { route 0::0/0 next-hop 2001:0001:0002:0003::5; }...
View Article