802.1X Authentication via RADIUS-Server does not work - no traffic/request at...
Dear community, I want that my EX-3300 blocks the access to the interface ge-0/0/0 as long as the supplicant is not authenticated. The authentication should run with the help of a RADIUS-Server. I am...
View ArticleRe: 802.1X Authentication via RADIUS-Server does not work - no...
What is the status of the interface before and after connections show dot1x interface brief And can you post the contents of the trace file you have configured after the failed attempt.
View ArticleRe: pure L2 multicast traffic (no multicast ip traffic) not forwarded
I can disable IGMP snooping at Vlan level and/or port level. Sure, it's clear !But it's not the ideal solution. Disabling it means flooding all multicast traffic. The L3 multicast traffic that is...
View ArticleRe: pure L2 multicast traffic (no multicast ip traffic) not forwarded
You may limit the L2 multicast using firewall filters..you may change the filters with appropriate terms as per your requirements..filter drop_multicast {term 1 {from {destination-mac-address...
View ArticleRe: pure L2 multicast traffic (no multicast ip traffic) not forwarded
IGMP Snooping should not affect other L2 multicast traffic - this traffic should be flooded with the VLAN. If this is not happening, I would consider this a product bug. You said the SW release you...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Re: 802.1X Authentication via RADIUS-Server does not work - no...
Hi! Thanks for your answer. Status before connection:802.1X Information:Interface Role State MAC address Userge-0/0/0.0 Authenticator InitializeStatus...
View ArticleRe: 802.1X Authentication via RADIUS-Server does not work - no...
I don't see an issue with the configuration and the logs indicate the messages are being sent. Can you confirm the switch source address is authorized in the RADIUS server. And maybe run wireshark on...
View ArticleRe: 802.1X Authentication via RADIUS-Server does not work - no...
Which SW release are you using on your EX3300? If not some version of 12.3, suggest you go to 12.3R12-S6 and re-test and report back. If using 12.3, which R release?
View ArticleEPL pseudowire type 5
Hi Community when we talk about EPL service as pseudowire type 5with RFC6870 enabled, we are reffering to L2circuit protocol configuration with hot-stdby configuration, correct? or are we referreng to...
View ArticleRe: 802.1X Authentication via RADIUS-Server does not work - no...
Also confirm whether the from switch to radius telnet on 1812 is working?Can you also share using which endpoint and client you are trying to connect? Also confirm, while doing this authenticaiton,...
View ArticleRe: 802.1X Authentication via RADIUS-Server does not work - no...
What version of RADIUS are you using? And the underlying OS (Centos etc etc)? If it's freeRADIUS running on Centos then make sure the NAS is configured correctly in the clients.conf and make sure the...
View ArticleRe: EPL pseudowire type 5
Yes in Junos the psuedowire point to point is configured as l2circuit and supports having a standby path. This uses LDP signaling. These are also commonly called draft-martini. the L2VPN...
View ArticleQ in Q between EX4200 and EX3400
Hi,We have two distributed offices and there are connected right now but only using 2 VLans from the provider. We want to use QinQ and one of these two Vlans to extend all of our vlans between these...
View ArticleRe: Q in Q between EX4200 and EX3400
Hello Georgi,What is your desired end goal in using Q-in-Q? Are you stating that the vlan you want to extend happens to already exist along the intended path for a separate purpose? In my experience...
View ArticleRe: Q in Q between EX4200 and EX3400
Hi J,Thank you for your response !What I want to do is: Servers < - - - > EX4200 < - - (Q in Q tunnel) - - > Service Provider < - - (Q in Q tunnel ) - - > EX3400 < - - - >...
View ArticleRe: Q in Q between EX4200 and EX3400
"Is this a mandatory requirement to have such dedicated switch for QinQ and all of my other Network/Server's VLAN to be separated from it?" In many cases the answer is no. This would depend upon your...
View ArticleProblem with EX3300 LLDP Discarded TLVs (Junos 15.1R6-S2.1)
I have problem with EX3300 (Junos 15.1R6-S2.1) which is connected to EX4300-32F (14.1X53-D45.3). EX3300 is sending SNMP traps every second with errors regarding LLDP and discarded TLVs. root@EX33>...
View ArticleRe: Problem with EX3300 LLDP Discarded TLVs (Junos 15.1R6-S2.1)
to find out why the errors are occuring and fixing the issue you would enable the trace options and we have a look at what errors are occuring so they can be fixed. To prevent traps you remove these...
View ArticleTotal bandwidth allocation for low priority queues exceeds 100 percent for...
Added a 10gb SFP and made it Layer-2 uplink, now getting this error.Total bandwidth allocation for low priority queues exceeds 100 percent for scheduler-map juniper-port-profile-mapI am not sure what...
View Article